Provide legal advice and services to patent holding company for portfolio found by using De Novo IP LLC mining tools detailed below. ▪ Legal responsibilities include: drafting complaint, infringement contentions, Markman presentations and briefs

Developed a legal-tech platform for the automated mining and evaluating of patent portfolios, based on: Python (Flask, NLTK); Redis for asynchronous processing; and a MySQL backend. ▪ Functionality includes: tiering portfolios by claim type and strength; automatic detection of potential drafting errors; and automated prior art searching and patent vetting. Demo videos available at http://www.denovoip.com. ▪ Provide portfolio mining and patent evaluation services. Work product includes: o Automatically generated spreadsheets that ranked patents within a portfolio into tiers based on metrics such as claim length, type, and claim keyword hits. Sample available upon request. o Automatically generated prior art reports that included metrics such as the percentage occurrence of claim terms within the corpus of prior art, which identifies potential points of novelty or terms needing construction. Sample available upon request

Built a legal-tech platform for theautomatedmining and evaluating ofpatent portfolios, eliminating labor-intensive yet error-prone human inquiry. The standard attorney billing rate is $500/hr.Spending 60 seconds/patent on a portfolio with only a few thousand patents still results in tens of thousands of dollars for de minimis analysis—such as guessing if a patent is a hit based on its title.

The De Novo IP platform solves this problem by providing features such as:

• Tiering portfolios bymetrics, as opposed tosubjective analysis, thereby streamlining and guiding manual processes with objective data-driven analytics—such as claim length, type, and claim keyword hits;
• Pre-emptive automatic detection of costly drafting errors, which is otherwise time-consuming; and
• Automatically generated prior art reports that include metrics, such as the percentage occurrence of claim terms within the prior art, which vet a patent’s validity before deciding to commit significant investment.

Evaluated portfolios of major patent holding and licensing companies for the monetization of intellectual property. Analysis required reverse-engineering accused products and code. ▪ Presented infringement, validity, and damages analyses for potential patent acquisitions, along with recommended litigation strategies to senior level executives. Representative Matters ▪ Wake Forest University Health Sciences v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., et al. (Consolidated Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-163 and 11-cv-713 XR) (W.D. Tex. June 2014): On the eve of the jury trial, Tensegrity secured a settlement of $280 million for client, Wake Forest University Health Sciences. ▪ In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (MDL No. 2354) (W.D. Pa. December 2013): Secured multi-million dollar settlement for client, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.